Sunday, September 3, 2023

Willis Hart, Rothbardian Libertarian tRump Supporter

So, Libertarians AREN'T racist? They just support enabling racism? Because... freedom?

Hmmm, Willis Hart identifies as a Rothbardian Libertarian? Why does Willis specifically identify as "Rothbardian" as opposed to just a "regular" Libertarian?

So I looked up Murray Rothbard and found that he "was a racist, and believed in the voluntary separation of the races".

Wikipedia/Murray Rothbard.

Murray Newton Rothbard (3/2/1926 to 1//7/1995) was an American economist of the Austrian School, economic historian, political theorist, and activist. Rothbard was a central figure in the 20th-century American libertarian movement and a founder and leading theoretician of anarcho-capitalism.

Rothbard opposed egalitarianism and the civil rights movement, and blamed women's voting and activism for the growth of the welfare state. Later in his career, Rothbard advocated a libertarian alliance with paleoconservatism (which he called paleolibertarianism), favoring right-wing populism and defending David Duke. In the 2010s, he received renewed attention as an influence on the alt-right.

Yeah, Rothbard sounds like a great guy. If you ignore the fact that he was a racist. Why the Hartster identifies with his brand of libertarianism? It just makes so much sense to him. I mean, everyone knows that the races shouldn't be mixing, right? That makes sense, economically, yes?

Wikipedia also notes that Rothbard thought Ayn Rand's Novel "Atlas Shrugged" was "not merely the greatest novel ever written, [but] one of the very greatest books ever written, fiction or nonfiction". Though he later had a falling out with her. Though not over his belief that allowing women to vote was a bad idea, apparently.

Given that Rand was also a misogynist. A woman that wished she had been born a man? I mean, the hero in another of her books, "The Fountainhead" was a powerful man who took what he wanted. Including a woman he wanted, who he raped. And the woman (as written by Rand) liked being raped. It wasn't really rape, since she welcomed it.

Willis Hart is a rape skeptic. Meaning, he thinks women often lie about getting raped. They decide to have sex with a guy, then later (after the sex) change their minds and cry "rape". They WANTED it at the time but later regretted it. And (for some reason) decided to try and ruin the innocent guy's life.

Does that sound plausible? Maybe it happens. But as frequently as Willis seems to think? No. Absolutely not. I think that (far more often) a guy thinks a drunk woman "consented" when she didn't. But it's the woman's fault, of course. In fact, maybe SHE raped him (if he was also drunk)?

But back to Rothband... he defended David Duke? And, "in the 2010s, he received renewed attention as an influence on the alt-right"? You don't say. Makes sense. One racist defends another racist. Alt-Right racists take cues from another racist. Could be why Willis Hart specifically identifies as a Rothbardian racist, I mean Libertarian. You think?

OST #226 @

Thursday, June 29, 2023

Paranoid Willis Believes His Blog Is Being Monitored By The Parasitic Sociopaths

Does Willis Hart live in fear of being grabbed one day off the street? A bag thrown over his head and thrown into the back of a window-less van?

Maybe. He does know he's being monitored AGAIN! So, obviously Biden's thought police are at least keeping tabs on him. Probably looking for chatter about overthrowing the government.

OST #225

Monday, July 25, 2022

Willis Hart Refers To Story From Fake News Website (National File) About Biden Daughter Showering With Her Father

"National File, a right-wing website, released an alleged copy of Ashley Biden's diary. It alleges that Biden took showers with her, molested her, and other highly inappropriate acts. The National File claims to have received it from an "anonymous whistleblower".

Biden hater Willis Hart references this fake news story in a commentary from 7/3/2022.

Not a ton of coverage, huh? Maybe because it's fake news. That's what Misbar (an independent fact-checking platform) says. Or "suspicious", at least. Yeah, I think so. Yet the Hartster takes it as a confirmed fact.

As per Misbar's investigation, "this source is highly questionable. For an anonymous whistleblower to be credible, the publication must also be credible. In this regard, the National File fails".

Obviously Willis believes the Qanon-esque bullshit about Joe Biden being a pedophile. Previously Willis wrote about Joe Biden being like a weirdo who drives around in a van offering children candy.

Willis is clearly ALL IN regarding the false narrative about Joe Biden being a pedophile. Yet doesn't care that much that donald tRump is sexually attracted to his own daughter. And has been credibly accused by over 20 women of sexual harassment and assault. And ON TAPE saying he grabs women by their privates.

According to Willis, donald tRump asks permision first. Before grabbing women by their pussies. Because tRump said (in the Access Hollywood video) "they let you do it".

"May I grab you by you pussy?". "Yes, I'd like that very much". ONLY THEN did Donald go ahead and grab women down there. And every time the woman being assaulted liked it.

OST #224

Sunday, October 10, 2021

Willis Hart (A Weirdo) Implies President Joe Biden Is A Pedo Who's Driving Around Snatching Kids

He also includes a picture of Dr. Faucci. Maybe he's riding shotgun in the Hartster's delusion? I guess Willis doesn't know that US presidents aren't allowed to drive. The sitting president isn't allowed to drive on public property, nor are (living) past presidents.

So Joe Biden isn't going to go crusing looking for kids to kidnap and sexually assault ever again. Unless the Secret Service is in on it. Not that he ever did previously.

OST #223

Wednesday, May 19, 2021

No, Actually It Is Both, Willis

As per a 5/12/2021 post by Libertarian Dotard-defending blogger Willis Hart, Dotard Donald never defended torture or the Iraq war.

Clearly this BS is in response to Liz Cheney telling the truth about Dotard Donald losing the 2020 election. Either Willis believes the Big Lie that Joe Biden cheated, or he just doesn't like that the Left is applauding Liz Cheney for telling the truth (even though the Left otherwise disagrees with 100% of Liz Cheney's political positions).

That's aside from the fact that Willis is full of shit. The FACT is that (and I can't believe Willis doesn't remember) Dotard Donald voiced support for waterboarding.

Additionally (in spite of lying about not supporting the Iraq war during the 2016 campaign), Dotard Donald actually did support it.

Fact check: Trump falsely claims, again, to have opposed the invasion of Iraq. Excerpt from a 10/29/2019 CNN article by Daniel Dale and Andrew Kaczynski.

What Trump actually said before the war

In his 2000 book "The America We Deserve", Trump argued that a military strike on Iraq might be necessary.

Trump wrote that the US still did not know the true status of Iraq's nuclear program. He then wrote, "I'm no warmonger. But the fact is, if we decide a strike against Iraq is necessary, it is madness not to carry the mission to its conclusion. When we don't, we have the worst of all worlds: Iraq remains a threat, and now has more incentive than ever to attack us".

He continued: "Am I being contradictory here, by presenting myself as a deal-maker and then recommending preemptive strikes? I don't think so. There’s nothing really comparable to unleashing a squadron of bombers, but in the world of business sometimes you have to make quick, secret, decisive moves in order to gain a negotiating advantage".

When radio host Howard Stern asked Trump in September 2002 if he is "for invading Iraq", Trump responded, "Yeah, I guess so. I wish the first time it was done correctly".

Trump did not express a firm opinion about the looming war in a Fox interview in January 2003, saying that "either you attack or don't attack" and that President George W. Bush "has either got to do something or not do something, perhaps".

What Trump said during the war

The day after the invasion in March 2003, Trump told Fox: "It looks like a tremendous success from a military standpoint".

Trump started publicly expressing negative or skeptical thoughts about the war shortly after it began. He called the war a "mess" in a brief comment at an Academy Awards after-party later in the week of the invasion. Six months into the war, Trump said, "It wasn't a mistake to fight terrorism and fight it hard, and I guess maybe if I had to do it, I would have fought terrorism but not necessarily Iraq".

Still, Trump did not express definitive opposition in 2003. In a MSNBC appearance in November 2003, he lamented US spending on the war and said that "the question is whether or not we should have been in Iraq in the first place” – but he continued: "I don't think that this president can do anything about that. He is really – he is on a course that has to stay".

In December 2003, Trump told Fox that the war had been "tougher than people thought", but he added, "It just seems to be something that, we are there now, we have to stay, we have to win, otherwise we just won't have the same respect".

It wasn't until more than a year after the invasion that Trump conveyed explicit opposition to the war.

Hmm. I can understand why Willis thinks Dotard actually opposed the war. He's an idiot that believes Dotard's lies. But Dotard never lied about not supporting torture. He was explicit in his support FOR torture.

Also, Willis was (and remains) opposed to waterboarding? I'm not sure. I'd have guessed he'd be for it. Either way, Willis is incorrect in the assertions he makes in his post. Liz Cheney and Dotard Donald both supported torture and the Iraq war. I didn't have to guess, given that I remembered. Clearly the Hartster doesn't remember.

OST #222

Friday, January 8, 2021

False Equivalencies In Defense Of Dotard's Sedition

According to the Libertarian Dotard-defending blogger Willis Hart, republicans objecting to the Electoral College votes being counted in states that went for Biden is just fine. Because Democrats did it too.

Al Gore and Hillary Clinton insisted for months that the election had been stolen from them? They fomented violence that resulted in supporters storming congress in the middle of the electoral college vote? I don't remember that happening.

Did Al Gore, in his position as outgoing VP, call ANY state rep and ask them to "find" enough votes to make him the winner, Willis? What state officials did Hillary Clinton pressure? Did Al Gore or Hillary Clinton (or any associate) urge their supporters to march on the capitol and engage in "trial by combat"?

I do agree with Willis that we have two sets of political rules in this country; one for Republicans and one for Democrats. He's wrong about who needs to develop a backbone, however. It's the Democrats. republicans (who want fewer people to vote) are going to move agressively to make it harder for people to do mail-in voting. Instead of allowing them to do this, Democrats need to counter them agressively.

As opposed to allowing republicans to get away with it. As they've allowed republicans to get away with supressing the vote for decades. Voter suppression is what allowed gwb to get the vote close enough in FL so his brother (with an assist from the Supreme Court) could steal the election from Al Gore.

High on the Biden Administration's agenda (as well as the agenda of the incoming Democratic congress) should be to pass the John Lewis voting rights act. Also high on the Democratic agenda should be pursuing charges against Dotard for his seditious actions (call to GA threatening that republicans in charge there "find" him enough votes to flip the election, inciting violence in DC, etc).

btw, if the VP can decide to throw out votes (as Dotard believes Pence could have), why didn't Al Gore throw out FL (or any other state) and make himself president?

OST #221

Tuesday, January 5, 2021

Willis Hart's Covid Delusions

According to the Libertarian trump-voting blogger Willis Hart, if not for the media reporting the news, nobody would have ever noticed we're in the middle of a pandemic.

Sure. Most people wouldn't have even noticed 350k deaths and our hosptitals being pushed to the brink. With the rationing of care being a very real possiblity (aka allowing people to die). If only the media had kept quite. But they had to blow this way out of proportion... what a f*cking idiot.

btw, not warning people with pre-existing conditions that they're more vunerable to a deadly virus certainly would have lead to even more deaths. Apparently Willis would have been just fine with that.

OST #220