Inconceivable... Due To magamoronity

Willis Hart: On the Fact that Our Federal Government Has Spent More Money (with a Significant Share of it Being, Waste, Fraud, and Abuse) than Any Other Entity In Human History and Has Also Racked Up Far More Debt than Any Other and the Left, Instead of Addressing These Matters, Starts Attacking the People Who Have Been.

They have something to hide. It's the only conceivable explanation in that while they may be morons at times they aren't stupid enough to die on a hill as preposterous as this one. Or one would think.

Posted on Monday, February 17, 2025 at 3:45 PM by Will "take no prisoners" Hart.

Commentary: "One would think"? Yeah, the one being Willis Hart. Also other Turds that support d0n0ld and el0n. A lot of other people do not think that. I asked the AI Copilot if the "only conceivable explanation" is that Democrats are hiding something...

Copilot: The claim that Democrats are opposing DOGE cuts because "they have something to hide" is an opinion expressed by the author of the blog post. It's important to recognize that there can be multiple reasons for political opposition, and attributing it solely to corruption may be an oversimplification. Democrats have expressed concerns that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cuts could undermine essential government functions, such as global development, humanitarian aid, and U.S. foreign policy. They argue that these cuts could have negative consequences for both domestic and international programs. While some may believe that opposition to DOGE cuts is due to corruption, others see it as a defense of important government services and programs. It's essential to consider various perspectives and understand that political motivations can be complex and multifaceted.

There is another explanation, yet the Hartster finds another explanation (other than Democrats being corrupt) inconceivable? I call BS. Unless he has his head up his ass. He should be able to conceive of another explanation. Probably he'd find the explanation false (incorrectly), but he should still be able to conceive of it. Unless he's a total moron.

You tell me why Willis can't conceive of any other explanation. He could just be lying. Lying, deluding himself, a moron. Take your pick.

 ost-234 

Willis Hart Endorses The Ethnic Cleansing Of Gaza

In a post from 2/10/2025 titled "On Hamas's Bigwigs Issuing a Statement Which Asserts that Trump's Gaza Plan Is Irresponsible", Willis Hart writes, "Yes, because as we're all aware bum-rushing into the region and slaughtering over a thousand peaceniks would have been infinitely more logical. What in the hell was Trump thinking?"

I don't know what Willis is thinking. I know what tRump is thinking. He wants to help Israel take Gaza from Gazans and forcebly relocate them. Whether they want to be relocated or not.

d0n0ld has a history of imposing this "help" on people that don't want it. Remember when he said, "whether the women like it or not, I'm going to protect them"?

This is more of the same kind of help. d0n0ld "helps" women give birth (against their will) to their rapist's babies. And he "helps" woman transition to the afterlife by making it impossible for them to receive the health care necessary to save their lives when they encounter a problem with their pregnancies. How "kind" of him to offer this "help".

Now d0n0ld wants to "help" the citizens of Gaza by forcefully removing them from the area. Even if they don't want to leave. This could be described as ethnically cleansing. Correction -- it IS being called ethnic cleansing.

Apparently the Hartster believes "irresponsible" is as critical as people are getting. And the "irresponsible" can be dismissed, given that it's Hamas saying that. Everyone else loves this plan. Is that what Willis thinks?


Above video description: Feb 5, 2025. President Donald Trump met at the White House Tuesday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, where Trump again suggested ethnically cleansing Gaza of its Palestinian population. Trump has already mused about moving Gaza's population to Jordan and Egypt, which those countries have flatly rejected, but on Tuesday he went even further and said the United States should "own" Gaza and develop it into a seaside tourist destination.

btw, I'm not aware of who is "bum-rushing" Gaza and slaughtering over a thousand peaceniks. wtf is Willis talking about? Many more peaceful citizens of Gaza have been slaughtered than 1000. Retuters says, "46,600 people, with just over half of identified victims being women, children or older people". Additionally, it is estimated that an additional 10,000 bodies are unrecovered under the rubble.

 ost-233 

Willis Hart Having Thoughts About Things That Aren't Happening Again

What a surprise, nobody is being encouraged to "rat-out" anyone. As confirmed by the Copilot AI. This seems to be a case where Willis takes some facts and twists them to serve the narrative he likes. In this case, the narrative being that the idiotic "wokesters" are forcing stupidity upon people against their will.

Unless you conform to what the wokesters want, you'll be ratted out. I can't say I agree with them encouraging cadets to not use the terms "mom and dad", though. Why not allow people to use whatever terms they want? Also tell cadets they should be accepting of any cadet they encouter who might want to use the terms "parent or caregiver" instead?

In fact, this appears to be exactly what happened. An "Outside the Beltway" story says "The Air Force Academy does not prohibit the use of Mom and Dad or other gender-specific terms". So what Willis claims is happening? It's not happening.

But the Hartster, being a DEI hater, of course believes this is being strictly enforced. If you don't comply, you get ratted out. What gave him that idea, I wonder? Some rightturd source? Or maybe he drempt it up in his delusions? Who can say?

The dude rarely gives any links. He just titles his posts "on the fact" (a lot of times). As if whatever he writes is a self evident fact that needs no confirmation at all.

Copilot Notes: [1] [2] [3]

 ost-232 

Willis Loves Zuck's Total Turd Pivot

The Biden Administration threated to investigate Zuck/Facebook? I don't believe it. It doesn't appear that Zuck even made that claim. Did Willis only imagine he did?

Maybe Biden people screamed at Facebook employees? I don't know. I surely do not believe anything the Turd Mark Zuckerberg says. While Willis (of course) immediately believes anything that fits his preferred narrative. ZuckerTurd is afraid of Turd-2 and potential harm to Facebook's bottom line if he doesn't suck up. He's a sniveling ass-kissing coward who is running to embrace everything terrible that d0n0ld stands for. Fvck him.

Video: Jan 14, 2025. Kara Swisher and Scott Galloway discuss Mark Zuckerberg's MAGA makeover, and his recent appearance on Joe Rogan's podcast. They unpack his call for "masculine energy" in corporate culture, and examine what masculine energy actually means.


Mark's new look is described by Scott Galloway as "Chechen Molly Dealer". The Hartster sez Zuck is "doing the correct thing" by embracing toxic masculinity, the Patriarchy, dumping on DEI, and kissing d0n0ld's ass? Obviously I strongly disagree with the right's definion of "free speech" as hate and disinformation.

But, that's where we are. This is apparently what the voters wanted. More voters said "we like lies and hate" and voted for the lying Orange Turd than people who said "we like truth and love" and voted for the Black lady VP to one of America's greatest presidents.

Copilot Notes: [1] [2].

 ost-231 

On Willis Hart Being Relieved That d0n0ld-Vance Were "Elected" Instead Of Harris-Walz

Tim Walz is "Sub-Mediocre" and d0n0ld tRump isn't? In Willis Hart's delusions, I guess. From what I've heard Tim Walz has done a great job as governor of Minnesota. MPR News says "The poll shows that 48 percent of respondents had a favorable view of Walz compared to 47.1 percent that had an unfavorable opinion of him. By contrast, 42 percent of those surveyed had a favorable opinion of Ohio Sen. JD Vance compared to 48.4 percent who had an unfavorable view of the Republican vice presidential candidate".

Has Willis said anything about the hypocrite JD Vance on his blog? Not that I've seen. I think there is much to criticize Vance for, yet Willis apparently can't think of anything. Apparently Wills completely forgot that Vance criticized single women who don't want children.

More likely I think he simply does not give a crap about "childless cat ladies". I bet he agrees with Vance's feces throwing at this demo.

fyi, the imbecile that won by a whisker was d0n0ld tRump. d0n0ld is a complete moron, as confirmed by people who worked in his disastrous first administration. Yet Willis seems relieved that d0n0ld has secured the reigns of power.

FYI, Tim Walz, as MN governor, never signed any legislation that mandated tampons be provided in boys bathrooms. That is completely false. "All 15 of the districts that responded Friday to a CNN survey of 25 districts, including the Minneapolis and St. Paul districts in the state's two most populous cities, said they comply with the law without providing tampons in traditional boys' bathrooms".

The whole "Tampon Tim" thing is total BS. No legislation that said boys need tampons ever existed. And, therefore, Tim Walz never signed any such legislation into law as Governor. Yet obviously the Hartster thinks this happened. Due to being completely oblivious to facts. Also maybe because Willis Hart is an imbecile?

 ost-230 

donald tRump Is Now A Convicted Felon. Charged & Convicted For Doing Nothing Out Of The Ordinary

Willis V Hart Said: On the Corporate Media Sh!ts Constantly Referring to Trump's Nondisclosure Agreement with Stormy the Stooge as a, "Hush Money Payment" And being that a great many of them have signed a nondisclosure agreement of their own (more than one, in all likelihood), they're clearly aware that what the former President did isn't even remotely out of the ordinary. But because it's Trump who we're dealing with. It's one step down from the Kennedy assassination.

Posted by Will "Take No Prisoners" Hart on Tuesday, June 4, 2024 AT 8:15 PM.

Commentary: Not even even remotely out of the ordinary, huh? The Access Hollywood tape had just come out and another scandal could really have been devestating for the campaign. So it was decided that the voters could NOT find out. None of those other non-disclosure agreements that Willis mentions have anything to do with preventing the voters from being fully informed before voting. This definitely would have cost tRump SOME votes. tRump wouldn't have agreed to pay otherwise. This whole "protecting his family" business is pure BS.


Microsoft AI Copilot: Former President Donald Trump was convicted of felonies related to falsifying business records. Here's what happened:

Charges: Trump faced 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. These charges stemmed from a payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election and attempts to buy the silence of two other individuals.

Business Expense Cover-Up: The charges were based on evidence that Trump improperly funded the payoff to Stormy Daniels as a business expense, disguising it as legal fees. The payments were actually for nonbusiness reasons.

Intent to Commit a Crime: Falsifying business records is a felony in New York if done with the intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission of a crime. In this case, the evidence suggested that Trump made false statements to cover up crimes related to the 2016 election.

Other Potential Crimes: While the indictment did not specify the second crime that elevated the misdemeanor charge to a felony, New York election law prohibits conspiring to promote a candidacy by unlawful means. The Daniels payment occurred before the 2016 presidential election that Trump won.

In summary, Trump's conviction was based on the falsification of business records, which is a serious offense when done with criminal intent. It marked the first time a former U.S. president was convicted of a crime.

 ost-229 

Communications From Blogger Re OST Content

In total I received 6 communications in regards to this blog. This blog was taken down shortly after I lost access to WYM. WYM was locked for 18 days, while OST was locked a lot longer. In total OST was locked for 53 days.

01. Blogger. Apr 18, 2023 at 7:01 AM.
Your post titled "Pr0fane Language In Support Of Destroying American Jobs" was flagged to us for review. This post was put behind a warning for readers because it contains sensitive content...

02. Blogger. Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 8:40 AM.
Your blog titled "http://oligarchicstoogetalk.blogspot.com/" has been removed. Your blog titled "http://oligarchicstoogetalk.blogspot.com/" was flagged to us for review. We have determined that it violates our guidelines and have made the URL http://oligarchicstoogetalk.blogspot.com/ unavailable to blog readers. Why was your blog removed? Your content has violated our HATE policy.

03. Blogger. Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:58 AM.
Your blog titled "http://oligarchicstoogetalk.blogspot.com/" has been removed. ... Your blog titled "http://oligarchicstoogetalk.blogspot.com/" was flagged to us for review. We have determined that it violates our guidelines and have made the URL http://oligarchicstoogetalk.blogspot.com/ unavailable to blog readers. Why was your blog removed? Your content has violated our HATE policy.

04. Blogger. Mon, May 6, 2024 at 1:01 PM.
Your blog titled "http://oligarchicstoogetalk.blogspot.com/" has been removed. ... Your blog titled "http://oligarchicstoogetalk.blogspot.com/" was flagged to us for review. We have determined that it violates our guidelines and have made the URL http://oligarchicstoogetalk.blogspot.com/ unavailable to blog readers. Why was your blog removed? Your content has violated our HATE policy.

05. Blogger. Wed, May 15, 2024 at 1:12 PM.
Your blog titled "http://oligarchicstoogetalk.blogspot.com/" has been removed. ... Your blog titled "http://oligarchicstoogetalk.blogspot.com/" was flagged to us for review. We have determined that it violates our guidelines and have made the URL http://oligarchicstoogetalk.blogspot.com/ unavailable to blog readers. Why was your blog removed? Your content has violated our HATE policy.

06. Blogger. Mon, May 27, 2024 at 3:58 AM.
Your blog titled "http://oligarchicstoogetalk.blogspot.com/" has been reinstated. Hello, We have re-evaluated your blog ... Upon review, the blog has been reinstated. ... Thank you for understanding. Sincerely, The Blogger Team.

This is BS. Note that the final message (concerning reinstatment) says "Thank you for understanding". I do not understand. How could I? Why was my blog flagged for hate? How, if there was hate on my blog, could I pass a reevaluation and be reinstated? I didn't remove any "hate". Yet they gave my blog back. Though with no, "we're sorry, there was no hate on your blog after all. We made a mistake".

Or, "our algorithms made a mistake. Your blog never should have been flagged. We are working to improve our algorithms". Naah. Nothing. Oh, and that post that was put behind a warning for "sensitive content"? That was in regards to me quoting the blogger Willis Hart. A commentary from his blog where he says "c0ck-suckers" in 1913 are responsible for there being a federal income tax. A fact he doesn't like.

It appears that, once you get a "sensitive content" warning applied to a post, you just have to live with it. What I read said I could revise the post to remove the sensitive content and then the post would be immediately reevaluated and (if you're good) the warning removed. But I tried that (in regards to several posts that were put behind sensitive content warnings) and no "reevaluation" occurred that I saw any evidence of.

The OST post that got flagged had no comments -- so I just deleted it. I made some changes then published it again. I had another post that got flagged on WYM (which was Mystere's fault) and that one had comments attached. Meaning, if I delete it I will lose the comments.

I made some changes and published it a second time. There are now two copies. One (with comments) that is behind a warning. Also a second copy that, so far, has not been flagged. I copied over the comments and appended them to the post. That way, if anyone has trouble getting past the warning (I had trouble with Blogger not wanting to give me access to my own content AT ALL) they can view the second copy.

Not that I think my blog has ANY readers. I just write for my own enjoyment. And I definitely don't think anyone is going back into the WYM archives to read posts from 2018. Which is when the censored post was published. Although Blogger didn't decide until 6+ years after it was published that they found the content objectionable.

btw, that word still exists in the post on the Hartster's blog. g00gle didn't sensor him. Though, most of the time I see that he writes "cork sucker".

 ost-228  @