Is the Libertarian blogger Willis V. Hart a Nazi? I ask the question because of the fact that he advocates for a White homeland for a "dispossessed white race". Also because he calls for "peaceful ethnic cleansing" of the United States.
OK, so it's actually the American Nazi Richard Spencer who wants a "peaceful" ethnic cleansing in order to make the USA a White Homeland, and not Willis Hart. But Willis absolutely does articulate very similar thoughts on his blog.
Like in this post, for example.
| Willis Hart: On the Fact that Even Though the Modern Nation-State Was Largely Brought About by a Common Ethnicity, Language, and Culture and the Overwhelming Evidence Is that Ethnocentric Societies Tend to Perform Much Better In Terms of Social Cohesion, the Mainstream Narrative Continues to Be One of Pushing for Diversity and Multiculturalism with Diversity Invariably Being Seen as a Strength. (2/24/2017 at 9:53pm). |
Surely sounds to me like he thinks separating the races is the way to go [1]. Just like the Nazi Richard Spencer. Someone Willis INSISTS, btw, is not a Nazi (OST #195). Fact is, the Hartster sez it's "unreal" to suggest Spencer is a Nazi.
That's despite statements such as the following (re DJT being installed as BLOTUS).
In the same speech Spencer went on to praise Trump for reminding us of what makes "the White race truly unique and truly wonderful". Something (the wonderfulness of Whitey AKA "Western Civilization") WTNPH pontificates on in the following commentary.
| Willis Hart: On the Fact that Even Though Western Civilization Has Given the World Science, Liberal Democracy, the Rule of Law, Equality Before the Law, Freedom of Thought and Expression, the Universal Concept of Human Rights, the Separation of Church and State, Economic Liberalization, etc., etc., the Leftists Continue to Denigrate it While Simultaneously Giving Non-Western Cultures a Total Free-Pass. And we're the only culture that engages in this form of pathological altruism and self-criticism. Why is that, I wonder? P.S. And, no, I'm not saying that we haven't done some bad things, just that every other society has as well and that these folks never get criticized (African slavery, for example, having been infinitely worse than Southern Victorian slavery and yet zero criticism) it seems. (2/23/2017 at 9:57pm). |
More Richard-Spencer-White-Nationalist-type rhetoric, I think. i.e. Whites are superior [2]. No wonder a (correct) reference to Spencer as a Nazi offends Willis so. They are of a like mind (i.e. they are both Nazis). Or one is a Nazi (Spencer) and the other (Hart) is sounding more and more like a Nazi every day. Even if he isn't a Nazi, he surely is a racist. Of that I have no doubt whatsoever.
For the record, I am NOT referring to Hart's "new" definition for a Nazi, which is (he sez) "anyone to the right of Jane Fonda bat-shit crazy".
Nazis (as per Wikipedia) believe in "racial hierarchy and Social Darwinism" and that White people belong to a "master race". Under this definition Richard Spencer is a Nazi. And Willis Hart, who apparently agrees with him (as per the posts I cite above) is also a Nazi. Or Nazi-ish, at the very least.
Notes
[1] Nazism "aimed to overcome social divisions and create a homogeneous society, unified on the basis of racial purity".
[2] "In its racial categorisation, Nazism viewed what it called the Aryan race as the master race of the world - a race that was superior to all other races".
Will sure looks like he's digging himself deeper and deeper. Not that he is likely aware of this fact.
ReplyDeleteI thought the the oldest existing code of law was the Code of Hammurabi dating back thirty-eight centuries. It's true that it wasn't quite as up-to-date as that of the Third Reich. It didn't have the part about a white sanctuary nation.
ReplyDelete